Colorado Rockies: What Jeff Bridich Learned From NFL Teams
In a recent interview, Colorado Rockies general manager Jeff Bridich explained some of his philosophies on building a successful sports franchise.
Fangraphs.com posted an interview with Bridich yesterday, and there were some interesting insights into the way the Rockies do business. Perhaps most interestingly, he cited two specific teams as inspirations – and they were both NFL franchises.
If you’ve got the time, the interview is worth reading in it’s entirety, but we’re going to look at what Bridich said about two football teams and how their organizational blueprints relate to the Rockies.
More from Rox Pile
- A Colorado Rockies Thanksgiving
- Colorado Rockies: What if Todd Helton had played football instead?
- Colorado Rockies: Charlie Blackmon out for the season
- Colorado Rockies: Injuries shift look of roster ahead of Dodgers series
- Colorado Rockies: Has Sean Bouchard earned a second look in 2023?
Bridich started the interview by praising this season’s NFC conference champions, the Atlanta Falcons. Here’s what he had to say.
“We try to draw information and glean what we can from [other sports]. I read an article the other day praising the Falcons’ ability to build their roster from where it was two years ago. There are elements of team, and elements of winning in professional athletics, that cross over from sport to sport… It would be tough for me to speak intelligently on [the Falcons’ philosophies and schemes], because we don’t live in their walls. But in terms of their personnel — how they’ve gone about that — the article I read was very complimentary of how they targeted specific things, and specific people, in free agency. They’ve also focused a lot on defense, and on getting faster and more athletic defensively, through the draft. You have to tie all those things together. That’s all part of what I mean by ‘Who you are.’ What is your draft position? What is your relative chance of having access to some of the best players that you would want in the draft? Decisions like that are interwoven into the bigger picture of, ‘Do we have to try to add somebody in free agency, or do we have to try to make trades?’ They’ve done it in a bunch of different ways, which is similar to how we look at the world.”
After talking about the Falcons, Bridich brought up the team they beat last Sunday, the Green Bay Packers
“In terms of a very narrow viewpoint of how to build a team, and a foundation for a team, the Packers are probably the gold standard in the NFL. The percentage of players on their roster who were drafted and developed by the organization is extremely high. I think it’s the highest in the league, and it’s like that year in and year out… The Packers have chosen, when they do go outside to get a free agent… it’s not a slew of free agents. They seem to be targeting one, or maybe two, per offseason. They’re saying ‘This is how we’re going to fix this problem we have.’ In a lot of ways, they’ve been very successful doing that. The big ones have been Reggie White, Charles Woodson, and Julius Peppers. But there are others. You could make an argument that Jerad (sic) Cook is one. And there are a couple of others, but they definitely do not live and die by free agency, or by trades.”
After talking football in the beginning, the interview started to shift into more baseball-focused questioning. Bridich didn’t exactly give much away in terms of their internal decision-making process (understandably), there was a paragraph about positional flexibility that stood out.
“Over the last few years, we’ve been talking a lot about athleticism and positional flexibility. Being in the National League, and being an organization that often carries one more pitcher than position player on its active roster, that’s essential for us. Bringing in a player with the versatility and athleticism of an Ian Desmond… we felt he was a great addition to an already strong position-player group. Alexi Amarista fits into that.”
ON THE FALCONS: Bridich isn’t wrong when he said the Falcons are good at identifying holes in their roster, and then doing whatever it takes to get those holes patched. But it’s harder for the Rockies, or any other MLB team, to draft for positional needs.
When an NFL team uses a first round pick on a player, it’s usually with the expectation that he will be starting for them next season. A first round pick of an MLB team, however, usually won’t be a starter in the major leagues for at least a few years (and that’s if he ever makes it the big leagues at all).
Identifying a need in free agency and going after a player that fills that role is a smart (if not somewhat obvious) strategy in any sport. But drafting young talent as an MLB franchise is a fundamentally different process than drafting as an NFL franchise.
If Bridich and the Rockies are taking a lesson from the Falcons, it should be having patience in the young talent in-house. After going 8-8 and finishing a distant second in their division in 2015, the Falcons could have blown things up. Instead, they kept the same squad mostly intact, added a few key free agents, and were rewarded with a trip to the Super Bowl.
ON THE PACKERS: Again, Bridich isn’t wrong in praising Green Bay for building from within. Being able to draft and develop talent with consistency is one of the best things you can to build up a team in any sport.
That being said, Green Bay also presents a clear example of the downside of being so reliant upon the draft. They are successful team, but the talent on their roster thins out quickly. Every team, no matter how good the scouting department, will have some years where their draft class is weak. The Packers are also dealing with this catch-22: if you draft well, the team improves, which leads to lower draft picks, which makes it harder to sustain that run of drafting success.
Building the team from within through the draft is a smart, noble goal. But going overboard and ignoring the other areas of team building, like free agency and trades, can be just as dangerous as neglecting the draft.
ON POSITIONAL FLEXIBILITY: It’s hard to say exactly what to make from this quote. On one hand, yeah, Desmond is athletic and can play multiple positions. On the other hand, how exactly are the Rockies going to utilize any of the flexibility? Move Desmond off of first base and you could be looking at either Amarista or Gerardo Parra; either of those would be among the least intimidating first baseman in all of baseball.
Unless, of course, the Rockies are seriously considering having Carlos Gonzalez play some first base this season. Gonzalez can hit enough to play any position, first base included, and fewer days in right field could help keep him fresher throughout the season.
Next: 3 Reasons For Optimism After Colorado's Offseason
The Rockies don’t have to make Gonzalez the permanent first baseman, but it would make sense if he logs some time in the infield this season. Not just for Gonzalez’s sake, but it would allow Colorado to fully maximize the positional flexibility that Bridich says he’s looking for.