Colorado Rockies: 3 things we learned from the opening series

The big fly is big

Jucied balls, changing approaches, more focus from front offices on home runs … it doesn’t really matter how baseball got here, but baseball is in a spot where the home run is king and there isn’t even anyone else in the royal family.

The Rockies are not a team built for home runs and that may be the answer to why their offense struggled last year despite having unarguably good hitters.

Colorado Rockies

That’s where it gets mottled for Bud Black. He has said many times that the Rockies have a good offense as evident by the club leading the league in runs. Most fans disagree with Black and were frustrated with production. While you can toot the Coors narrative and that’s part of the reasoning for the two-sided sword, I’ll side here. The Rockies do not hit enough home runs for the way big league baseball is played currently.

Over their series with the Diamondbacks, the round tripper accounted for 11 of Colorado’s 12 runs.

This offseason, Jeff Bridich made it his goal to strengthen the Rockies in terms of run prevention. He did that valiantly. On the other side of the diamond though, if anything, Colorado lost power, letting Mark Reynolds‘ 30 dingers walk. There isn’t a great argument that they should’ve kept Reynolds yet it’s still clear that this team is lacking in the longball.

Nolan Arenado and Charlie Blackmon can’t account for the team’s entire production again. The team needs at least two more 30 home run hitters, Trevor Story and Carlos Gonzalez need to step up.

Ian Desmond and Gerardo Parra already did this on Friday night by chipping in with production. They not only drove runs home, but they also drove home the point that the Rockies will be reliant on a skill the club is not built to display.